Jun 7, 2009

Overheard in Philadelphia-a warm, family-oriented town

Well, almost in Philadelphia-this strange little tidbit I overheard in Upper Darby last night.

A middle-aged woman, walking with a cane with another woman, said to her companion:

"I've only been shot twice. Once was with my Mom..."


They were walking one way, I was walking another, so I didn't hear the rest of it.

I don't know if her friend said, "Oh yeah, well, I've been shot three times, plus stabbed twice! So there!" Sort of a sick version of the scar comparison scene from Jaws, maybe.

Philly's a tough town, but I didn't know that you needed to keep score like that.

Jun 6, 2009

Tonight is a full Moon

Watch out...

for absolutely nothing.

The full Moon doesn't mean a thing...although it's suspected that Joe Biden collects hair samples from werewolves on the full Moon.


UPDATE: I never knew if that CCR song was actually saying, "There's a bad Moon on the rise", or "There's a bathroom on the right."

Guess it's the former.

ATM angst



Nice work by the wonderful illustrator Moira Hahn.

Maynard Ferguson-Body and Soul



I haven't posted anything lately from my ultimate musical hero (and the hero of so many other trumpet players), Maynard Ferguson.

Here's a blow-out-the-doors performance on the classic standard, Body and Soul, from the mid-80's. Huge, thrilling opening cadenza and swinging interpretation of the melody (on flugelhorn) by MF; tenor sax solo by Matt Wallace.

"The democracy of the dead"

Classic Chesterton on tradition:

"I HAVE never been able to understand where people got the idea that democracy was in some way opposed to tradition. It is obvious that tradition is only democracy extended through time. It is trusting to a consensus of common human voices rather than to some isolated or arbitrary record. The man who quotes some German historian against the tradition of the Catholic Church, for instance, is strictly appealing to aristocracy. He is appealing to the superiority of one expert against the awful authority of a mob.

"It is quite easy to see why a legend is treated, and ought to be treated, more respectfully than a book of history. The legend is generally made by the majority of people in the village, who are sane. The book is generally written by the one man in the village, who is mad. Those who urge against tradition -- that men in the past were ignorant -- may go and urge it at the Canton Club, along with the statement that voters in the slums are ignorant. It will not do for us. If we attach great importance to the opinion of ordinary men in great unanimity when we are dealing with daily matters, there is no reason why we should disregard it when we are dealing with history or fable.

Tradition may be defined as an extension of the franchise. Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes -- our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth: tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death. Democracy tells us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our groom tradition asks us not to neglect a good man's opinion, even if he is our father."
'Orthodoxy.'

Pharoah, let my people go!

Preferably on a trip to some sunny clime in the Mideast.

Leave your missiles at home.

Jun 5, 2009

Angels and dummies

Yes, Dan Brown writes fiction. You really need to bear that in mind if you pick up one of his books. And like most Catholic bashers, he never lets the facts get in the way of a story, good or otherwise.

John C. Brown, presumably no relation, takes a look at a few of the whoppers in "Angels and Demons":

"Brown claims: Copernicus was murdered by the Catholic Church.

"Fact: Copernicus died quietly in bed at age 70 from a stroke, and his research was supported by Church officials; he even dedicated his masterwork to the Pope.


"Brown claims: 'Antimatter is the ultimate energy source. It releases energy with 100% efficiency.'

"Fact: CERN, the lab which plays an important role in his story, actually debunked this claim on their website: 'The inefficiency of antimatter production is enormous: you get only a tenth of a billion of the invested energy back.'


"Brown claims: Churchill was a 'staunch Catholic.'

"Fact: Any history buff could tell you that Churchill wasn’t Catholic, he was Anglican; nor was he particularly religious. The only things Churchill was staunch about were cigars, whiskey, and defending the British Empire.


"Brown claims: Pope Urban VII banished Bernini’s famous statue The Ecstasy of St. Teresa 'to some obscure chapel across town' because it was too racy for the Vatican.

"Fact: The statue was actually commissioned by Cardinal Cornaro specifically for the Cornaro Chapel (Brown’s 'obscure chapel'). Moreover, the sculpture was completed in 1652 — eight years after Urban’s death.


"Brown claims: Bernini and famed scientist Galileo were members of the Illuminati.

"Fact: The Illuminati was founded in Bavaria in 1776. Bernini died in 1680, while Galileo died in 1642 — more than a century before the Illuminati were first formed..."



Link via Scuffulans hirsutus.

We're just mild about Barack

Obama's approval rating has hit a record low of 54%, with his disapproval rating following suit and hitting an all-time high at 46%, according to the Rasmussen robots.


The Administration has to be worried about numbers like these, when the media is still in adoring gaze mode and the public mood overall is far better than it was in January.

Obama, no Latino, makes unnecessarily risky Court choice

The President, while undoubtedly a bright guy (don't hold that Ivy league education against him), wasn't smart enough to find a safer Supreme Court nominee, for one obvious reason:

"Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor said today that 'if President Obama were a wise Latina woman, with the richness of her experiences, he would have picked a less controversial court nominee.'

"Judge Sotomayor said she doesn’t blame the President for his unwise choice, 'after all, as a black male, he can’t be expected to demonstrate much more wisdom than he has so far. He’s certainly sharper than a white male, but the fact remains that he’s male, and has no discernible Latino heritage.'”

The procedure opponents call torture

Sudden thought: since liberals, and most of the media, are always calling partial birth abortion "the procedure that opponents call 'partial birth abortion'" (and always with scare quotes), can't those of us on the other side of the political fence call waterboarding "the procedure that opponents call torture"?

It's all in how things are worded. Those who reviled George W. Bush, and who hope to prop up his successor, figure that if they call rough interrogation procedures "torture" often enough, they'll win the argument-without ever having to make the cause that the techniques used actually were torture.

Similarly, if the same folks can make it seem as if only a small group of zealots think partial birth abortion is a kind of infanticide, they can convince the rest of us that it's not a monstrosity-without ever discussing what actually happens in a partial birth infanticide.

Jun 4, 2009

George Tiller-more evil than Jeffrey Dahmer?

The man who killed late-term abortionist George Tiller should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. No one has the right to execute any type of murderer-that is the State's authority, alone.

Yet there can be no doubting that Tiller's actions were remarkably evil, even in a society that tolerates the grave injustice of abortion. How do his actions compare with those of serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, who was also killed by someone who took the law into his own hands?

Edward Feser:


"Do I seriously mean to suggest that Tiller was as bad as Dahmer? No, because Tiller was almost certainly a more evil man than Dahmer was. There are at least five considerations that favor this judgment.

"First, Tiller’s victims were more numerous than Dahmer’s.

"Second, Dahmer expressed remorse for his crimes. Tiller never did.

"Third, and relatedly, Dahmer was apparently fully aware that what he did was evil, while Tiller pretended, to himself and others, that what he did was not evil. Some might think that such self-deception lessens Tiller's moral corruption, but in fact it exacerbates it. A man who knows that what he does is evil but does it anyway is corrupt; a man who has become so desensitized to the evil he does that he can no longer even perceive it as evil is even more corrupt. The sins of the former are likely to be sins of weakness; the sins of the latter, to be willful sins of malice. (Older moralists understood this. The modern cult of 'authenticity' and 'sincerity' has blinded us to it – and is itself a mark of our own grave moral corruption.)

"Fourth, and again relatedly, Dahmer was evidently to some extent acting out of compulsion. This does not exculpate him, and the compulsion was a consequence of his freely indulging his evil for years. Still, his will evidently had become so corrupted that he eventually reached the point where he could barely control himself. The problem was only exacerbated by the fact that his murderous impulses were associated with various sexual perversions – always unruly under even the best circumstances – and that he had learned to indulge his dark desires in secret, free from the fear of exposure and shame that would deter most others afflicted by the same bizarre temptations. Tiller’s murders, by contrast, were committed openly, and resulted from no compulsion at all. It was neither bloodlust, nor sexual perversion, nor any other ungovernable passion that drove him to baby-killing, but the cold and cruel willfulness of the ideologue. If Dahmer was a miniature Caligula, Tiller was a poor man’s Stalin, Hitler, or Pol Pot.

"Finally, Tiller added to his already unspeakable crimes the grave sin of blasphemy, insofar as he was (we now know) a churchgoer who evidently regarded his obeisance to Moloch as fully compatible with the religion of Jesus Christ. To my knowledge Dahmer never had the temerity to claim that a good Christian could be a cannibal..."

Jun 3, 2009

The Pope is right on condoms

It's de rigueur to beat up on Pope Benedict XVI over his comments on condoms, AIDS, and Africa. The old guy has spent too much time reading and writing airy theological works, and not enough dealing with the real world-ignoring the fact that priests, who hear confessions, know the world all too well.

But the Pope isn't wrong at all. Edward C. Green, director of the AIDS Prevention Research Project at the Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, has said that the evidence confirms that the Pope is correct in his assessment that condom distribution exacerbates the problem of AIDS.

"'The pope is correct,' Green told National Review Online, 'or put it a better way, the best evidence we have supports the pope's comments.

"'There is,' Green added, 'a consistent association shown by our best studies, including the U.S.-funded "Demographic Health Surveys," between greater availability and use of condoms and higher (not lower) HIV-infection rates. This may be due in part to a phenomenon known as risk compensation, meaning that when one uses a risk-reduction technology such as condoms, one often loses the benefit (reduction in risk) by compensating or taking greater chances than one would take without the risk-reduction technology.

“'I also noticed that the pope said monogamy was the best single answer to African AIDS, rather than abstinence. The best and latest empirical evidence indeed shows that reduction in multiple and concurrent sexual partners is the most important single behavior change associated with reduction in HIV-infection rates (the other major factor is male circumcision).'”


(see the full interview with Green here)



Link via Dave Armstrong.

Want to lose weight?

Leave near-and shop at-Walmart.

Walmart's low prices improve your purchasing power-that is, make you richer. This means you tend to buy better food, as richer people do-more fruits and vegetables.

This has heavy implications for public policy, according to the economists who wrote the piece for Forbes:

"Do you want to make poor people healthier? Then restricting the growth of discount chains is the last thing you should do. Instead, repeal programs that distort incentives--like agricultural subsidies that make junk food made from corn and soybean derivatives artificially cheap. Next, cut payroll taxes. With more take-home pay in their pockets, lower-income workers can afford to buy foods that are better for their health."


(I'm posting this for my brother Dennis, who like so many Democrats hates Walmart with an unreasoning passion, mostly because the great unwashed shop there.)

That's a Maothfull

It seems the Chinese have this capitalism thing down pretty well at this point. They've certainly learned to rattle off b.s. just as readily as their American counterparts. Here's what the head of the Chinese company that acquired Hummer from the former General Motors had to say about the brand, one not exactly known for its EPA ratings:
"Yang Yi, the chief executive of Tengzhong, said in a statement released by G.M. 'We will be investing in the Hummer brand and its research and development capabilities, which will allow Hummer to better meet demand for new products such as more fuel-efficient vehicles in the U.S.'”

Jun 2, 2009

"What makes us happy?"

From a famous longitudinal study of Harvard men (John F. Kennedy was a participant):

"...[P]ersonality traits assigned by the psychiatrists in the initial interviews largely predicted who would become Democrats (descriptions included 'sensitive', 'cultural,' and 'introspective') and Republicans ('pragmatic' and 'organized')."


Maybe that means Republicans should run our government and Democrats write our music. The only important jazz musicians I've ever heard of who were Republicans were Don Ellis and Stan Kenton, and conservatives are, as we all know, greatly out-numbered in Hollywood.

The study goes back to 1937 and was designed to figure out what might cause people to be happy, that ever-elusive goal. I noted with interest that people my age (pushing 50!) are much more likely to be happy as oldsters if they are in good physical shape as they slip into middle age, which I am, even if I can't necessarily say the same for my psyche.

The Atlantic piece is a fascinating read and much worth your while, though it will take more a few minutes to read.

Happiness is worth the effort, right?


Link via Greg Mankiw.

Jun 1, 2009

Congratulations, Mr. and Mrs. America!

Your household is the proud owner of $668,621 in debt.

"Only" about 5/6 of that is federal.

Assuming no more deficits (fat chance) and a 5% interest rate (also, fat chance), if we all paid about $43,000 a year, we could pay it off in thirty years. That's a heck of a mortgage.

Now, considering that a Democrat is in the White House, and that all of the new debt is being piled up for only the best of reasons, we needn't worry at all about the effect on interest rates and such- not if Paul Krugman's to be believed, anyway.